Brickipedia:Featured Article Nominations/Olivia

Articles for Rating → Featured article nominations → Archive → Olivia

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it.

Nominated by: Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}
Nomination comments:First off don't mind the red links, they're being taken care of we just need a FA nom for this month :P. Anyway I think this article is really great and like I said we need new FA's monthly. We should also have a mini doll FA :3

Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}
Like, why not? ~~ Regards, Sibo the First (talk) 14:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Looks more than fine to me. Vasko (talk) 07:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Berrybrick (talk) 19:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Looks very complete. I can't see anything that's missing. LCF ^(talk!) 19:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
It has lots of content, is very comprehensive, and most of the grammar/spelling errors seem to have been fixed now. I'd say it's good. BrickfilmNut (talk) 03:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

~~Various spelling/grammar issues (see comments section) NovaHawk 11:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)~~

There are some spelling errors and some other wordy things that I'll fix when I get round to reading it. CJC95 (talk) 15:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

* Could you give an example and I'll look for them, I can't find any Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Flamish isn't a word either :) Definitely needs a spellcheck at the very least- "progtagonist" was in the lead section alone. Also I don't think we need "LEGOLAND variants" - those are real people :P Not saying they shouldn't be in the article somewhere though, it's good to mention that kind of thing and pictures help. Some other things:
- Variant names in infobox are very long, maybe somehow making them less wordy?
- Variant names in infobox should match variant names in minifiguregallery
- ~~Something else I've forgotten whilst typing this~~

I would say it's FA potential though NovaHawk 11:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

LOL I never noticed that it was flame yellow orange :P Thanks! Where will we put the LEGOland variants then? I think they make the article look more proper :P I think more images will make it look cluttered, and that amount that is currently on the page is enough. I don't think we can make the variant names shorter, I'll match the names in the gallery though, and it was CJC who spelt progtaganist :P Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

After going through the article and proofreading everything (You missed some stuff, Nova! >:D ), I'm almost ready to support. The tense in the Background section is inconsistent at times (something I did not get around to fixing yet), and looking through the article again, perhaps a picture for the Resort Designer Fusion thing is a good idea (especially since the set's article itself needs one anyway). After these are complete, I think that I'll support, but I'd need to give it a final read-through. BrickfilmNut (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

What picture do you want for the resort designer/Fusion thing, there's nothing really that happens in the game :P Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

I guess either an image of the set, showing the Olivia minidoll amongst the other pieces, or just a screencapture with Olivia on screen. Whichever you'd think works best with the rest of the article.BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2015 (UTC)