Shortcut: BP:CLASS1 BP:GAN

This page is for nominations for articles to be promoted to Good Article status. The good articles of the wiki are articles that should represent the above average content of Brickipedia. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite themes, minifigures, etc. or to get praise for your "hard work" on an article.

A good article must...

...comply with the manual of style completely.
...have its infobox(es) filled out as best as possible.
...have a lead section that describes the basic infos of the subject like release year, theme, rough overview of the content.
...have at least one long original paragraph that describes the subject in extensive detail, as well as at least one additional original paragraph that contains further information about a different aspect or peculiarities of the subject.
...have an external links section (sets only)/appearances section (minifigures only)/a complete set list (themes only).

How to nominate:

First, nominate an article you find is worthy of good article status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
If, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 3 supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be given Good Article status.

To place a nomination, please use the following syntax:

== [[<article>]] == *'''Nominated by:''' ~~~~ *'''Nomination comments:''' ===Vote score: ±0, Technical Check: Currently OK=== ;Support ;Object ;Technical MoS Check (QCG members only) ;Comments

How to vote:

Voting is restricted to registered users, and:

Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
1. If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid.
2. Either way, update the vote count in the section header, add 1 when you support the article, minus 1 when you object.
3. (QCG members only): If you find that this article does not comply with the Manual of Style, list the reasons why under "Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)", and sign your name along with ({{RG}}).
As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
If after one week the nomination has at least three supporting votes, the ratio of supporting votes to opposing votes is 70%, and if there is nothing listed under the Manual of Style check heading by a QCG member, the nomination is approved. However, if after three weeks any of these criteria are not met, the nomination is to be removed. If legitimate opposing votes have been made but not addressed for one week, the nomination is also to be removed. The original nominator may also remove any of his nominations if he/she sees fit.
The nominator of an article is not permitted to vote.

Nominations[edit source]

Submit a new nomination

Date Nominated	Article	Nominator
13 December 2014	Ariel (2)	Soupperson1
2 January 2015	Cinderella	Berrybrick
8 July 2015	Andrea	Soupperson1

Please see Category:Class 1 article nominations archive for past nominations.