Brickipedia:QC/2009

Brickipedia →

Quality Check Group

→ FA Review Archive

→ 2009

2009

This article is just a list and is unlikely to meet the current FA criteria. Maybe we should start a "Featured list" project in the future. --User:LegOtaku/sig 17:26, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I may be a little late here, but this is no FA. -Nerfblasterpro: I PRESS SMASH BUTTON! 22:03, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Does anyone else have an opion on this? -Mariofighter3: Brickfliming now in session! 13:01, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

Should be Complete Article.User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 11:27, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

• IMO it should be able to keep FA status. It isn't a normal page, and it's a pretty darn good list :P User:Ajraddatz/sig 00:18, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
• I say it definitely deserves CA (actuallly, I'm giving it c2 status now, feel free to start a review if you want), but a list for an FA? I don't know :S NovaHawk 00:37, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

I think it should definitely count as either complete or good, but probably not as FA. User:Cligra/Sig

Voting

Remove FA status

1. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 09:10, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
2. I don't think it is or will ever have the potential to reach an FA standard. Some articles only have the potential to become CA's, and I think year articles fall into this category. NovaHawk 09:14, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
3. Cligra (Assumed from above comments)
4. Nerfblasterpro (Assumed from above comments)
5. Frankly, it's essentially a list of sets. User:Fudgepie/sig 21:16, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

Keep FA status

1. Ajraddatz (Assumed from above comments)