Brickipedia:Quality Check Group/Requests/Archive

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful Soupperson1, Requested 19:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Request comments: We need more QCG members, as most aren't active :( think I'd be a good choice as a new member :P I constantly get articles to C2 and it's quite annoying having to nominate them each time. I also see a ton of articles that need ratings or updated ratings, so this would be handy. Anyway please vote either way, thanks! Support Oppose Comments Its almost been a month, and still no activity :P Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3 Before we do much to QCG like adding members I believe we need to resolve what we're doing with ratings. Forum:Brickipedia: The reincarnation/Article Ratings --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was archived due to age Nightshade, Requested 20:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Request comments: I'm requesting this again(formerly LazerzSoH, last request failed) in order to rate the lower articles. I don't have too much experience with C2 and C1 articles, but I can usually see a slight difference. I'm really only requesting these rights to rate C3, C4, and C5 articles. Most of the articles I viewed today were unrated. I definitely know the difference between those types of articles. I think I could make some use of these rights, so I would hope that you would consider this request. Nightshade (talk) 20:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Nightshade Support Oppose Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful Edward Nigma, Requested 02:23, 6 June 2014 (UTC) Request comments: I'm requesting to become a QCG membermember because I've had lots of experience here on Brickipedia. I'm a chat moderator, rollback, patroller and an active editor. Lately there's been a lot of unrated articles and editing going on, so I believe I'm well-suited for this position. LCF (talk!) 02:23, 6 June 2014 (UTC) Support ToaMeiko (talk) 02:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC) CJC95 (talk) 17:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC) Oppose Most of my votes here are based on the user's experience in nominating articles for c4/3/2, and their c1/fa votes. However, looking through contributions here, I'm only seeing one edit in this area. Although it was successful, I'd need to see a bit more activity in this area for me to judge rating ability, sorrry. NovaHawk 23:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC) Comments ...I just realized I didn't make nomination pages for the other two I nominated two months ago. LCF (talk!) 21:25, 25 June 2014 (UTC) I'd like a little more data for my vote. Roughly how many articles have you not just nominated, but edited to a solid (not borderline/barely) c2 or c1? --Jeyo (talk) 07:05, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful King of Nynrah, Requested 11:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Hi all, it's me! Since I plan to return to active editing upon Brickimedia's official launch, I figured I'd apply for QCG rights before I do so. On the original site, whenever I made a new page, I would just let the unrated pages pile up for a member of the QCG to rate, but if I get the rights here that won't be necessary. I have a good understanding of how the current ratings system works and would love to join your ranks in scouring the Unrated articles category too. I haven't done much on this version of Brickimedia yet, but on the old Wikia version I participated in quite a few votes for C1/C2 articles. -King of Nynrah (talk) 11:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Support Full support. Vasko (talk) 12:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Why not. CJC95 (talk) 12:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Finally. --ToaMeiko (talk) 00:21, 1 February 2014 (UTC) # Happy to support. Clone gunner commander jedi talk 00:59, 1 February 2014 (UTC) (Sorry CGCJ, but from what I can tell, you're not QC) NovaHawk 01:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC) I thought you already had it NovaHawk 01:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC) Ajraddatz (talk) 08:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC) Oppose Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful CJC95, Requested 20:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC) Request comments: Was a member of the preceding group, I have more experience editing than all but one of the current members, am more active then 90% of them, and although haven't nominated much, its clear that I can write good articles, and can spot ones that are just horrible. CJC95 (talk) 20:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC) Support ok --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC) Berrybrick (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC) NovaHawk 21:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC) Ajraddatz (talk) 17:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Oppose Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful Vasko (Legoboy9373), Requested 11:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Request comments: I had put up a request about two months ago on the site hosted by Wikia, but unfortunately, nobody saw it. I decided to postpone it, and I thought that now was the time to put it up again. I think I am ready to join this group since I have gathered quite some experience and have improved a lot of pages (I do think so). Thank you in advance. Vasko (talk) 11:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Support I don't see why not. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC) Berrybrick (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC) (thought I already voted on this) NovaHawk 04:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Ajraddatz (talk) 17:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Oppose Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful Darth henry Request comments: I just want to see how I would do, I mean I really am not that bad at ratings. Please don't just support or oppose. Please give reasons. :) If you want to test me, just give me sample articles and I could tell you what I would rate them. User:Darth henry/Sig 04:34, April 11, 2013 (UTC) Support Oppose Many of the articles you nominate are for c3, which - while not bad - is also not enough to sway me. It is true that you have successfully gotten some articles to c2, but not as many as I'd like to see. (And the four turtles' articles were pretty much copied from each other, so I only count them as one. :P) And while more c2 articles would definitely be a plus point, I'd also like to see you get a couple articles to c1; I don't think I've seen any of those from you. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:24, April 11, 2013 (UTC) ^ klagoer 12:02, April 11, 2013 (UTC) Per Jeyo. Berrybrick 18:45, April 11, 2013 (UTC) Comments Ok, thanks I'll deifnately work on those. And the turtle articles weren't pretty much copied, they were copied :P User:Darth henry/Sig 19:34, April 11, 2013 (UTC) Well yes, they were copied, but the facial expressions and the colours of their bandanas were changed to suit the article. Therefore, "pretty much copied". :P -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:46, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful Hunterkiller1440, Requested 02:30, March 14, 2013 (UTC) Request comments: Uh, I know I might fail but yeah. I know how Im not really seen much and stuff so yeah :S. Support Oppose No work at all to improve articles rating-wise. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:38, March 14, 2013 (UTC) Per Jeyo. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 02:42, March 14, 2013 (UTC) (Only members of the QCG are permitted to vote.) (Sorry. :P I am a CQM, though.--LEGO2013Helper (talk) 02:44, March 14, 2013 (UTC)) :P -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:46, March 14, 2013 (UTC) ^ NovaHawk 05:27, March 14, 2013 (UTC) ^ Berrybrick 10:36, March 14, 2013 (UTC) No work in the QCG areas. Ajraddatz (Talk) 11:52, March 14, 2013 (UTC) ^ klagoer 12:14, March 14, 2013 (UTC) Comments User does not have the required amount of mainspace edits. Archiving. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 17:29, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful SuperSpyX, Requested 21:31, November 19, 2012 (UTC) Request comments: I have been creating a lot of pages lately and they don't seem to be getting rated very fast. I believe I have a good grasp of how the rating guidelines work and I think I could be a good QCG member. Support Oppose I haven't seen a lot of requests from you. I'm sorry that it took almost twenty minutes for me to come on chat and rate your article, but I don't think that is a very valid reason. Berrybrick 21:35, November 19, 2012 (UTC) Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think you've ever gotten an article to Class 1 or even Class 2 status. (If you want articles rated quicker we do have a nominations page.) Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:37, November 19, 2012 (UTC) I HAVE used the nominations page. I would put my nom at the bottom, but then others would put more and while theirs would be rated, mine sometimes weren't. This happened about three times and I got tired of it. User:SuperSpyX/Sig2 I can understand how that would be irksome. (Although most of that happened before I was a QCG member, so I don't know what else to say.) Do you have any that need rating now? Because there don't seem to be any on the nomination pages and there haven't been for some time. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:13, November 19, 2012 (UTC) Actually, there is still one I nommed for C2 that has been there for at least 2 months and STILL isn't done. User:SuperSpyX/Sig2 (Done. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 22:18, December 11, 2012 (UTC)) Per the others. klagoer 21:39, November 19, 2012 (UTC) Sorry, per above. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:21, December 21, 2012 (UTC) Comments He could help convert articles to c3 or c4. It was either NBS or another admin who told me they had trouble converting the lower class articles but could easily do c2s, c1s, and featured articles. He could be helpful. The other voting reasons have to be taken into account. User:LazerzSoH/signature I feel like I'm the opposite. We aren't the perfect team, but there is usually somebody with a strength to make up for another's weakness already. I'm not saying that more members would be a bad thing, but I do not think that SSX is qualified for the reasons expressed above. Berrybrick 19:48, November 28, 2012 (UTC) I have set myself a personal goal to get all the LEGOLAND theme sets from c4 to c3. It would be a lot easier to be able to rate these myself instead of adding a huge load to you guys, especially since Jeyo is about the only one doing it right now. User:SuperSpyX/Sig2 Heh. Though I would agree that Jeyo is probably the most active, he being the only one rating articles is not true at all and I find that very rude and contradicts something you told me a couple weeks ago. There is no way I am changing my mind on your nomination anytime soon now. Berrybrick 18:18, December 21, 2012 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful Agent Fuse, Requested 07:14, September 20, 2012 (UTC) Request comments: I seriously think the QCG needs some more members. About five of my Complete Article requests have been waiting around for around two weeks now. I know I'm not a Class One or Featured Article maker or voter, but something needs to be done. I'm willing to stay on C2 and C3 only, as well as make Unrated articles to C4, C5 (or whatever). Support Just becuase you don't to too many C1/FA articles doesn't mean you don't know how to do C2/3/4s. I've never done too much around the top, but that doesn't mean I don't know how to tell a C4 from a C3. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature Oppose While you have several successful Class 2 nominations, and seem to be right almost every time, I think that part of the job of a QCG member is to vote on C1 and Featured articles. If you are not willing to do that, then you can't be a QCG (at least in my opinion). Agent Charge Please vote 20:48, October 1, 2012 (UTC) If memory serves, he has never had a successful C1 or FA nom before. Also, a lot of his nominated C2 articles have very short backgrounds that often need expanding. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge Per Jeyo and Charge. Also, if he isn't interested in voting for C1/FA, which takes probably nearly as much time as finding an article/fixing it up, to me that we seem like intentional negligence of a whole duty all the time. (So kind of what Charge said. :P) Berrybrick 23:12, October 12, 2012 (UTC) Comments As muchas I wt to leen to support I want to say I would like you to at least vote on C1's and FA's nominations. If you do that before your request is closed I will gladly support. :D klagoer 00:11, September 23, 2012 (UTC) Charge, I am not unwilling to vote on C1 and Featured articles. It's just that what I do takes up a lot of my time, and usually I spend my Brickipedia time in fixing up articles. User:Agent Fuse/sig 06:51, October 2, 2012 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful CzechMate, Requested 00:51, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Request comments: I have a good amount of article experience, and know when it's c1, c2 or c3, and I do honestly believe I could help out the team, and possibly get some articles rated quicker. Thanks --User:CzechMate/czech 00:51, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Support Oppose I've severely disagreed with every one of his Monster Fighters set nominations.. So, per my oppose to Jeyo, I'm not really sure if he has suitable judgment skills about the level an article should be at (that doesn't sound right, but I'm not sure how to correct it. :S). (also, from what I've seen, he has very few successful nominations) User:Cligra/Sig Sorry, but I'm still seeing way too many "Not done"s next to nominations made by this user. NovaHawk 08:23, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Way to many "x"'s on the nomintaion's page by this user. klagoer 11:49, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Comments On the F12 army, you have 8 listed c2's, and no c1/FA. Have you done any more that haven't been reported? User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:04, September 4, 2012 (UTC) few, yeah, I'll need to look through my contribs, if Lord V passes, I'll have a c1 under my belt. --User:CzechMate/czech 04:15, September 4, 2012 (UTC) And also, if you're going to oppose due to c1s or FAs see SKP's support to Jeyo. --User:CzechMate/czech 04:21, September 4, 2012 (UTC) I do agree wtih SKP but also it isn't just your FA's and C1's I'm worried about, it is C2's, and other stuff. klagoer 11:51, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful Jeyo, Requested 21:56, August 23, 2012 (UTC) Request comments: Well, I know I'm a bit new, but I have over 60 Class 2 articles and two Class 1 articles under my belt and I'm extremely active. I think I could help out the wiki a lot through the QCG. Support I think he can handle the rights, and would be able to clearly judge the appropriateness (is that a word?) of ratings for articles. User:Captain Jag/sig1 23:26, August 24, 2012 (UTC) Per Jag, just because he hasn't had success with C1's or FA's shouldn't be reason to oppose. After all, that requires a community vote. User:SKP4472/sig3 17:00, August 29, 2012 (UTC) Has had some noms fail in the past, but does appear to be on the lookout for sub-standard articles which shouldn't be rated as high as they should be. Appears to be more thorough in checking articles against the MoS than most other users when voting or nominating articles. If Jeyo does make a mistake, in most cases this user also seems to fix the article up instead of just leaving it NovaHawk 03:56, August 30, 2012 (UTC) Honestly, we really need more raters, and looking over this user's history I think that he'll be able to it well. User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:53, September 2, 2012 (UTC) He seems to be right (almost) every time. Agent Charge 00:47, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Has definitely improved. User:Cligra/Sig Oppose I would like to see a bit more expierence in the C1 and Fa. Wait a few months, due some more work, make yourself really comfortable, and I will definatly support. :) klagoer 22:22, August 24, 2012 (UTC) Seems to be fairly confident with C2's, but I don't really think he understands the level a C1 or FA should be at. User:Cligra/Sig Per Klagoer's first sentence and Cligra. Berrybrick 17:34, August 27, 2012 (UTC) Comments If my class one nominations were being looked at, I may be able to get more done and through that, more experience. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge Currently, this is at fail, because although it passes the 60%, it is at +2, rather than +3. However, this rule was made to stop votes like 1/0 from passing simply from non-voting, so I think I may pass this. Any other comments? User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:13, September 4, 2012 (UTC) After thinking about this, I'm going to make it a pass. The reason is that he has passed the 60% requirement, and although he has not got a +3, the reason that was made was to prevent 1/0 or 2/0 nominations, i.e. nominations where a few people vote but nobody else votes, so an insufficient number of opinions are put forward in the discussion. This is a closing as per the 'new' system, and as such, may be contested, with a further discussion, if anyone is upset. User:Captain Jag/sig1 04:39, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Sorry, this seems wrong to me, I don't know about anyone else. Firstly, if a change to the criteria was to happen, I would say that it should happen to any subsequent requests- a request was entered in to on certain terms, I just think it should end like that. Secondly, the change hasn't been approved, so I don't get how action can be taken based on a suggestion that hasn't gone through, while the system which was voted through should be ignored. May just be me :P NovaHawk 08:23, September 4, 2012 (UTC) Actually, the system wasn't voted through; you suggested it, nobody commented, and then I added it :P So I guess you could say that requirement shouldn't really even be there :D User:Captain Jag/sig1 08:43, September 4, 2012 (UTC) I've been asked to comment here, but have no clue what pass requirements are, but, I've noticed a lot of moaning about how long requests take, so I don't see what harm a new member would do, even if he doesn't meet one requirement. (Personally, the QCG seems over-regulated to me, but then again, not paying attention to this stuff, you may need all these requirements and what not for... whatever reason.) ~ CJC 19:35, September 7, 2012 (UTC) In answer to Berry and Cligra, I believe I understand the level of C1 and FA much better now than I did before, as shown by this. If someone were to nominate Lord Vladek for C1 right now (which was an article I nominated some months ago), I would oppose it. I learn from my mistakes and tend to not make them again. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge If I see one more nomination of that quality from you, I will change to support. (besides, I'm tired of having to rate all your stuff. :P) User:Cligra/Sig Such as this? Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful Agent Charge, Requested 20:55, July 4, 2012 (UTC) Request comments: I feel like I could handle these rights, and I know how the system works. Support Has done some more since my previous vote, and consistently seems to be getting things right NovaHawk 03:34, July 24, 2012 (UTC) --User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:38, July 24, 2012 (UTC) Per opening spiel. :P User:Cligra/Sig # I see a lot of Requests in the C2, C3 etc. from him, all of which have been done. I would trust him with the rights. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig (Sorry, you must be a member of the QCG to vote here) Sure, we could use more. User:Ajraddatz/sig 04:06, July 24, 2012 (UTC) Seems like he could use it. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 15:11, July 24, 2012 (UTC) Oppose # Has been very good with juding the ratings, but has only made 4 noms that I can see, and also only one vote in FAC/GAN. I guess I'd just like to see a bit more activity and therefore more data before I support. NovaHawk 22:47, July 4, 2012 (UTC) Comments So.... this should have been closed about two weeks ago, but there wasn't any response until about 24 hours ago. Should we either close it now, or let it run for a week from July 24 (when actual voting started)? NovaHawk 12:00, July 25, 2012 (UTC) Close, since you probably don't have any more active members to vote in it :P ~ CJC 15:17, July 25, 2012 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful Mr. Minifigure, Requested 14:27, April 7, 2012 (UTC) Request comments: I have nominated articles for every type of Class and only one has not passed but for something very minor that I will fix. Support Honestly, you do very good content work and we could really use some more active QCG members. User:Ajraddatz/sig 15:19, April 7, 2012 (UTC) Sure. NovaHawk 21:45, April 7, 2012 (UTC) User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature Oppose Comments So at this point in time it just needs one more vote. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 12:41, April 13, 2012 (UTC) Looks like it passed. :) User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 13:22, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was request pulled Zaersk, Requested 00:33, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Request comments: I am Zaersk, and requesting to be a member of the Quality Check Group. I am familiar with Brickipedia's Manual of Style very well, and nominated three articles for Class 2, which in the end was approved. I also successfully nominated articles for Class 3 and 4 status' which were also approved. Although, I also nominated three for Class 2 which didn't make it. One I can understand why, the other two- not so much. You see, when I nominated those two part articles, (Part:3308px1 and Part:6053c01) the MOS stated that it just needs a description. (Doesn't say how much of a description length the article requires). source I saw that, and decided to nominate both articles. Although, Ultrasonic NXT said it needed a longer description. I don't blame him. Although, I see many, many Part articles I pass by with Class 2 ratings, but have one sentence descriptions. So, that's the reason for Part:3308px1 and Part:6053c01's unsuccessful ratings. Since I was informed on this information, I feel now I am ready to become a QCG member. (Also, if you think I am a bit inexperienced with article maintenance, give me a test on a article, and I'll give you the rating it should be.) Thanks for your time! User:Zaersk/sigcodes 00:33, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Support Neutral I think that you'd do well, but I recall Mr. Minifigure's request for QCG failing because the only Class 2 articles he nominated were part articles. I'll stay neutral though, for now. Berrybrick 00:49, January 6, 2012 (UTC) I just remembered your requests for a couple of Super Heroes and Hero Factory. I'll think about it more. Berrybrick 00:52, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Off to a good start, but I'd just like to see more experience with nominating Class 2 and higher. I don't really pay attention to Part articles since we haven't really developed a decent MoS for them, but in terms of other articles, 2 out of 3 were successful, would just like to see a bit more experience here and maybe a higher success rate. NovaHawk 00:55, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Oppose Sorry but you just started to frequently edit here. My vote will probalby chnge though --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 04:34, January 6, 2012 (UTC) (Only Quality Check Group members can vote here) Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful Harryhogwarts, Requested 23:04, November 14, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: I have been on this wiki since January, and have been resourceful, and reliable on. I believe I can be a great rater. So, please, I'd like to become a rater. Support Oppose You do some good work here, and I thank you for that. I am concerned with some of your edits, though, and that you don't respond to concerns left on your talk page. You also haven't suggested any articles for rating. Please get some experience at Brickipedia:Articles for Rating first. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:25, November 14, 2011 (UTC) Per Ajr's last part. (Of his ten-word sentence paragraph page opposition essay.) User:Captain Jag/sig1 23:29, November 14, 2011 (UTC) NovaHawk 00:14, November 15, 2011 (UTC) Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful Crazed Penguin (2), Requested 00:14, November 3, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: I think I could make a good rater. I'm studying the MOS and understanding it alot better.-CP Support Oppose Sorry, but I haven't seen you actually successfully nominate an article yet. NovaHawk 00:35, November 3, 2011 (UTC) I have submitted a few for rating. 2 Succesful. Cp Sorry, but just all of a sudden nominating a heap of articles just to try and get some votes here doesn't convince me. Also, even with two successful noms, your success rate is still probably below 20% overall. NovaHawk 01:23, November 3, 2011 (UTC) What's this I hear about success rates? FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:26, November 3, 2011 (UTC) ??? He's nominated a lot of articles in the past, a lot of them have failed. Obviously if the majority of nominations are failing, it's not a good thing to let someone assign ratings NovaHawk 01:31, November 3, 2011 (UTC) Not the reason for nominating. I saw the articles and justrequsted higher ranking. User:Crazed Penguin/100DaySig Per NHL, sorry. User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:21, November 3, 2011 (UTC) Neutral What do you think? It's in the Oppose section, isn't it? User:Captain Jag/sig1 00:49, November 14, 2011 (UTC) Comments So you have been understanding the MoS better? Good. Now put into practice what you have learned from it, and then come back. User:Captain Jag/sig1 23:32, November 14, 2011 (UTC) OK. For the next....3 weeks I will submit articles, checkthem for Eniglish UK and no US. User:Crazed Penguin/SigBlue 04:35, November 15, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:39, October 5, 2011 (UTC) TheGrandEditor, Requested 16:27, September 13, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: Support Oppose This is weird, because I thought you were already in it, or would be overqualified to join. While I know you to be a great writer and a great user in general, your contributions appear to indicate that you've never voted in FAN, GAN, or nominated an article for any rating (correct me if I'm wrong, because I'm sure I've seen you do these things, it's just that your contributions lists are telling me otherwise). I would just recommend submitting a few articles for rating/voting on things first to show you have experience in rating the articles, sorry (nothing personal) NovaHawk 00:52, September 14, 2011 (UTC) Per NHL, you haven't seemed to be active in this process before now... User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:06, September 14, 2011 (UTC) Per NHL, please submit some articles for rating and if they pass I may make my vote a support. User:SKP4472/sig2 06:22, September 15, 2011 (UTC) Per the rest. You easily could be, with a few nominations. —Unsigned comment by UltrasonicNXT (talk • contribs). Per everyone. Nominate some articles first. User:Captain Jag/sig1 23:35, October 5, 2011 (UTC) Comments Closed as not done. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:39, October 5, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request unsuccessful Mr. Minifigure, Requested 08:18, September 7, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: Support You are making so many pages, that this sure would make my job easier! User:Cligra/Sig Are you not? </complete disbelief> NXT (PC Problems) Fortunately for the FA concerns, that always requires a vote :p User:Ajraddatz/sig 22:39, September 12, 2011 (UTC) Hell yeah! -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 22:41, September 12, 2011 (UTC) Oppose Definitely a well-rounded editor. However, after previewing your Alpha Team FA nom, I think a bit more experience is needed. Once again, please don't take this as an offense because I truly believe you are one of the foremost and welcoming editors we have. User:Fudgepie/sig 22:25, September 12, 2011 (UTC) No offense taken. Also I would like to point out that thing sat there for onths :P User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 22:28, September 12, 2011 (UTC) Weak oppose. Just been through your contributions, while you have a great record for Class 3 and 4, personally what really counts for me is Class 2 and above. The only Class 2 noms I've seen are for parts, and I don't really consider them to be on the same level as other Class 2's- let's face it, basically all you have to have is a complete list of appearances and a filled out infobox. So the only "big nom" I've seen is the failed FA nom. Don't get me wrong, the lower classes do count to an extent, which is why this is only a very weak oppose. NovaHawk 00:08, September 13, 2011 (UTC) Comments Has it been a week? User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 12:25, September 15, 2011 (UTC) It's only +2 though, would you really want it to end like that? --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:23, September 16, 2011 (UTC) True yet you need 60% positive and i think altogether positive votes are 66.6666%. Correct me if I'm wrong. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 12:59, September 19, 2011 (UTC) And a +3 vote count. Sorry but it's been open for nearly two weeks now, I've got to close it. NovaHawk 23:03, September 19, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Failed Crazed Penguin (1), Requested at 9:51am AEST Sunday Hi i'm Crazed Penguin and I believe i can rate articles well and i know a good article from a bad one and i know that rating an article is a serious process. If i join then i can be the little penguin who comes on everyday to rate unrated articles: Support Oppose No way, Jose. You've hardly got any experience, and the quality of your edits are inconsistent. Also, your grammar is relatively poor, and others including myself have had to correct some of your grammatical mistakes on pages. Besides that, you haven't formatted this request properly. Sadly, I'm afraid this example inspires little confidence in me of your abilities. Sorry, User:Fudgepie/sig 00:03, August 28, 2011 (UTC) Not enough experience yet, sorry. User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:18, August 28, 2011 (UTC) Comments How should I improve? Because I would like to join in the future. --User:Crazed Penguin/Sig 2 09:18, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful Berrybrick, Requested 01:34, August 28, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: Support Just because you formatted your nomination right. Lol. User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 01:41, August 28, 2011 (UTC) It took me a moment Berrybrick talk -- "That's Mr. Commander Sergeant to you. 01:47, August 28, 2011 (UTC) We could really use another reviewer... User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:11, August 28, 2011 (UTC) I have no objections. A solid editor who appears to have a grasp for these matters. =) User:Fudgepie/sig 02:15, August 28, 2011 (UTC) Per B3. User:SKP4472/sig2 07:46, August 28, 2011 (UTC) User:Captain Jag/sig1 05:46, August 29, 2011 (UTC) User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 10:50, September 4, 2011 (UTC) User:Cligra/Sig Oppose Comments I don't want to sound impatiant, but it's been a few days over a week so… Berrybrick (Talk) 19:19, September 7, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Failed Mr. Minifigure, Requested 19:55, July 20, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: I have nominated many articles and most of them have passed. I feel I would be a great addition to his gruop and have improved since my last nomination. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig Support User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:57, July 22, 2011 (UTC) Can I do this without being a member? Anyway, I don't care whether they have nominated articles for class whatever, he is a good user and trusted, and you can't exactly say the QCG has many active members atm. - Kingcjc 20:00, July 22, 2011 (UTC) Read the red text. User:Captain Jag/sig1 20:04, July 22, 2011 (UTC) So, the problem is you have practically no active members, and yet you can't get more active members without active members. :P - Kingcjc 20:11, July 22, 2011 (UTC) User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 21:52, July 22, 2011 (UTC) Oppose Sorry, but the only articles I have seen you nominate are Class 2, 3, and 4. What about Class 1? I understand about FA. User:Mykheh/sig 20:14, July 20, 2011 (UTC) It isn't exactly necessary for a candidate to nominate Class 1 articles- Crown Knight's can't just put an article up to Class 1 by themselves. User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:57, July 22, 2011 (UTC) Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request successful Mykheh, Requested 18:51, July 6, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: I am applying for QCG Member once again. Throughout the time period from resigning to applying, I have nominated many more articles. I now have nominated three Class 1's (all successful), as well as all other Classes except FA (high success rate). Support Per last time. User:Ajraddatz/sig 18:52, July 6, 2011 (UTC) Of course. User:Cligra/Sig User:Tatooine/SigT 18:55, July 6, 2011 (UTC) Has definitely proven himself to be capable for this job. Good luck :) NovaHawk 00:55, July 7, 2011 (UTC) Totally. =) User:Fudgepie/sig 01:40, July 7, 2011 (UTC) Yup. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 04:16, July 10, 2011 (UTC) Oppose Comments CAN I JOIN THE AGENTS!04:01, July 10, 2011 (UTC)Lego Leader

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request failed Mr. Minifigure, Requested 19:13, June 18, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: I feel that I am expierenced enough to take on this task. I know I am not the best editor but I think this would help me become a better editor. I have nominated articles before and most of them have passed. Please take the time to vote. Support Oppose Concerns with lack of experience in article rating. Maybe he/she could be more active in the branch before placing another nomination? User:Tatooine/SigT 22:17, June 18, 2011 (UTC) Per above. User:Fudgepie/sig 22:22, June 18, 2011 (UTC) Only nomination to date for any class is the one Fudgepie said- a Class 2 nomination for Part 93666, which was initially not approved (see project namespace contibs). So I feel they need a bit more experience before joining (sorry) NovaHawk 23:15, June 18, 2011 (UTC) Per Tatooine, concerns with experience. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:22, June 18, 2011 (UTC) Per others, doesn't have enough experience. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 11:35, June 19, 2011 (UTC) Comments You said you've nominated articles? Looking back in the archives, I've only seen you nominate one article for Class 2... User:Fudgepie/sig 22:16, June 18, 2011 (UTC) Can i join the crown knights ?03:21, June 26, 2011 (UTC)Lego Leader

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request failed Agent Swipe, Requested 01:22, June 14, 2011 (UTC) Request comments:None Support Oppose Eh, I don't know if the nominee has enough experience in Article rating yet. Nothing personal. User:Tatooine/SigT 03:32, June 14, 2011 (UTC) Same feeling as Tatooine, haven't seen them around much. User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:38, June 14, 2011 (UTC) Comments Yeah I probably don't deserve this yet sorry guys... User:Agent Swipe/sig1 --- The dawn is coming... Don't feel sorry - you're a great user, Swipe. But you just need more experience in Article Rating before this nomination can pass.:) User:Tatooine/SigT 18:32, June 14, 2011 (UTC) Exactly, it isn't a matter of deserving, just of not enough experience in this area yet. Keep up the good work that you've been doing and then request this again later :) User:Ajraddatz/sig 18:39, June 14, 2011 (UTC) Why do I have to wait two months before doing this again? User:Agent Swipe/sig1 --- The dawn is coming... Isn't the idea of joining the group so they can rate articles? In which case, surely it makes sense they have no experience. Kingcjc 21:33, June 18, 2011 (UTC) Thats only if they have experience in rating them - if we pick a user who has little experience on article rating, and throw him on the job, we'll have LOTS of contested ratings let me tell you that. The user can gain experience though by successfully nominating articles for their respective ratings on the nomination pages.:) User:Tatooine/SigT 22:04, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request withdrawn Mykheh, Requested 04:40, June 8, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: Sometimes when I am active, no other QCG member is, which means nominations may not receive a verdict for awhile. I have completely met the qualifications for this position. My successful nominations out number my failed ones-only one has been marked with the Not Done template, and two, I believe, were moved to either a higher or lower class. Based on the fact that I have only nominated one article for Class 1 and one or two for class 2, I choose to withdraw from this nomination. If I was another user voting for this user, I would oppose. User:Mykheh/sig 15:47, June 10, 2011 (UTC) Support Sure. Why not? User has experience in Article rating, and has successfully nominated various Articles for Class 2, and one GA. Only got one ND template for an article he nominated. User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 00:40, June 10, 2011 (UTC) Per Tat. User:Cligra/Sig User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:50, June 10, 2011 (UTC) After reconsidering my former stance, I believe Mykheh would be a valuable member since he can give ratings when most of us probably aren't around. What are a few failures compared to the overall success he's had in nominating articles? Shouldn't be a reason not to support. =P User:Fudgepie/sig 02:35, June 10, 2011 (UTC) Oppose Comments # Neutral lol, once again I have something long to say. =P Anyway, I'm neutral for now, since I have one objection. For the good part, I believe Mykheh is a good user who is generally quite knowledgeable and would make a good member of the QCG. However, I'm still a tiny bit wary of his nominations. Firstly, some of his nominations seemed a bit "premature" for certain classes. Simply put, a miniscule amount of articles he has nominated doesn't exactly fit the guidelines of those classes. Of course, this is just my opinion, but I feel it might be best if he can have a bit more experience in successfully nominating class 2 or even class 1 nominations. That's why I would neither support nor oppose. For now. That might change... =) User:Fudgepie/sig 01:54, June 10, 2011 (UTC) Fudgepie: The word miniscule means small, so that means the larger portion of the articles I have nominated were not premature. What matters should be the larger portion. —Unsigned comment by Mykheh (talk • contribs). Okay, scratch that. I suppose I'm just being a bit too severe in regards to article standards. Maybe my perception is just too high of a standard for class 2. Please forgive me for my curtness, Mykheh. =( In this regard, I'm probably in the one in error. Again, please accept my most humblest apologies. Sincerely, User:Fudgepie/sig 02:28, June 10, 2011 (UTC) Neutral as per Fudgepie's above struck out comments. Really hasn't had any experience in nominating articles for Class 2 or higher, which is really the borderline between "meets MoS" and "doesn't meet MoS", something that QCG members should really be the most clear on. I'm not saying this user doesn't know the difference, just that there hasn't been any evidence that they do. NovaHawk 08:27, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Failure Lego lord Requested 23:28, 4 April 2011 Request comments: I try deciding how great an article is in my mind. I am very familiar with our Manual of Style and I believe that I can help the group by becoming a member. Please give a solid reason as to why you agree or disagree. User:Lego lord/sig.1 23:28, April 4, 2011 (UTC) Support Oppose Comments Don't know yet. But nominating this for a GA when it clearly doesn't meet the GA criteria (ie ...have at least one long original paragraph that describes the subject in extensive detail, as well as at least one additional original paragraph that contains further information about a different aspect or peculiarities of the subject) does make me lean towards opposing due to not quite having a good enough knowledge of the system. Will have a look through a few more noms/votes in the history when I have time before I make a decision. NovaHawk 23:41, April 4, 2011 (UTC) Also, you know the exact time by copying the syntax above as it says to, or just use five tildes, ie ~~~~~, which prints the time only. NovaHawk 23:41, April 4, 2011 (UTC) Thanks. sorry about nominating 3365_Space_Moon_Buggy for a GA, I should have nominated that for a CA instead. User:Lego lord/sig.1 The only reason I nominated that article is because I was getting confused with the ratings "complete" and "featured" - I thought they were the same thing, but now I'm cleared up. It's getting quite late, and I haven't had any supports or opposes. User:Lego lord/sig.1

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Failure Agent Swipe, Requested 15:37, April 12, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: I think I would be fine for this kind of job on this wiki. Support Oppose Comments Have you nominated any articles for 'Complete Article' Status? User:SKP4472/sig2 16:34, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Success UltrasonicNXT, Requested 18:56, April 10, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: there are so many articles that I come across that have inaccurate ratings, that I easily spot. I would definately help us (Brickipedia) in becoming a better rated place, by being able to change them myself, rather than having to nominating them. (I also tend to want to change class 5/4/3 articles, rather than further up ones) User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature Support All of his proposals are correct. User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:00, April 10, 2011 (UTC) User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:33, April 10, 2011 (UTC) User:SKP4472/sig2 05:49, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Success SKP4472, Requested 09:13, April 2, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: I have requested to become a member of the BOR/CCG because I feel that I'm capable of changing the ratings to the rating that suits the articles quality best. I'm also familiar with the Complete Article criteria and Manual of Style and believe that I can be of allot of help to the group by being a member. Thanks, kind regards. User:SKP4472/sig2 09:14, April 2, 2011 (UTC) Support Is active in making well-reasoned FAC and GAN votes, and nominates articles at CAP, with a fairly high success rate. NovaHawk 09:16, April 2, 2011 (UTC) See no reason why not. User:Ajraddatz/sig 15:28, April 2, 2011 (UTC) . Good at checking for ratings. P.S. Can we make a rule that you put {{RG}} at the start of your message? Then it's much easier to quickly count them. User:Captain Jag/sig1 20:58, April 3, 2011 (UTC) Oppose Comments (off-topic): If any other member votes here, can they take a look at the talk page please? NovaHawk 09:16, April 2, 2011 (UTC) It's been a week now. Can we come to a verdict please? Thanks. User:SKP4472/sig2 16:40, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Success Fudgepie, Requested 02:44, April 25, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: I've seen quite a few pages whose ratings are not very consistent. Already I have successfully nominated 3 pages for Complete Status, and I believe I can do a good job for future ones. Thanks User:Fudgepie/sig 02:44, April 25, 2011 (UTC) Support Clueful user, no problems here. User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:45, April 25, 2011 (UTC) User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 17:12, April 25, 2011 (UTC) User:Captain Jag/sig1 04:36, April 26, 2011 (UTC) Oppose Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Success UltrasonicNXT, Requested 18:56, April 10, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: there are so many articles that I come across that have inaccurate ratings, that I easily spot. I would definately help us (Brickipedia) in becoming a better rated place, by being able to change them myself, rather than having to nominating them. (I also tend to want to change class 5/4/3 articles, rather than further up ones) User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature Support All of his proposals are correct. User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:00, April 10, 2011 (UTC) User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:33, April 10, 2011 (UTC) User:SKP4472/sig2 05:49, April 12, 2011 (UTC) Oppose Comments Have we come to a decision yet? User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 07:20, April 16, 2011 (UTC) Voting lasts for one week. User:Captain Jag/sig1 07:35, April 16, 2011 (UTC) oh, ok I didn't know that. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 09:01, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Success Tatooine, Requested 21:32, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Request comments: So far, as you can tell, a lot of articles come flying in the class X nominations pages; and eventually they build up. I feel that I can help. So far I have nominated 3 articles for CA and one for FA (2 for, 2 oppose) and a lot for classes 3 and 4. And all of them have been successful. User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 21:32, April 27, 2011 (UTC) Support User:Captain Jag/sig1 05:48, April 28, 2011 (UTC) User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 15:09, April 30, 2011 (UTC) Nerfblasterpro: Always supplying the boomsauce... 19:14, May 6, 2011 (UTC) User:Ajraddatz/sig 19:42, May 6, 2011 (UTC) Oppose Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful ToaMeiko, Requested 19:31, September 3, 2013 (UTC) Request comments: Pretty self-explanatory why I'm requesting this — to continue to help improve the wiki. I've been doing a good job (from what I have heard) as RQM and CQM, so I figured it was worth going for QCG as well. --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:31, September 3, 2013 (UTC) Support I feel his skills in writing and identifying errors in articles, as well as the research he puts in to articles should give him this title. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 20:13, September 3, 2013 (UTC) Had some good ones at BM. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:18, September 4, 2013 (UTC) Berrybrick 03:18, September 4, 2013 (UTC) User:SKP4472/sig3 07:44, September 4, 2013 (UTC) @Jeyo below- I definitely remember Meiko nominating a lot of things somewhere, must have been on the other site as mentioned NovaHawk 22:51, September 8, 2013 (UTC) Oppose Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think you've nominated many articles for a higher class, nor were they mostly for c2 or c1. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:11, September 3, 2013 (UTC) I've only nominated one article here (Wikia), which was then chosen for C2 (which was what I nominated it for). At Brickimedia, I had several article nominations, where all were given what I nominated it for or higher. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:29, September 3, 2013 (UTC) What were the other nominations for? -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:51, September 3, 2013 (UTC) Various articles I spent time editing to get them up to MoS compliance. I can't think of specific ones. The one I did here at Wikia was 30106 Ice Cream Stand. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:54, September 3, 2013 (UTC) Comments I know it isn't required, but can those who support please provide reasons for doing so? -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 08:01, September 4, 2013 (UTC) You have to be different, don't you Ajr :P ~ CJC 12:28, September 4, 2013 (UTC) I love that old symbol D: Ajraddatz (Talk) 19:27, September 10, 2013 (UTC)