Brickipedia:Request for Rollback/Archive

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki

Grovyle4life

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Unsuccessful

Verdict

  • Why do you need rollback rights? I don't see many reverts in your contribs. User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:58, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not Done. Closed due to inactivity. NovaHawk 07:28, June 12, 2011 (UTC)


Mr. Minifigure

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Unsuccessful

Verdict

X mark.svg Not Done. per below (sorry) NovaHawk 03:01, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose


Mykheh

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request successful

I am requesting rollbackrights. Dictionary.com defines vandalism as deliberately mischievous or malicious destruction or damage of property. Nope. This act is not good here, or anywhere. Having started editing on Brickipedia more than a year ago under the account Thomas Wonderson, I have seen vandalism occur here.

Verdict

Done. User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:27, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Cligra

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request successful

Cligra - Contribs - Block log - User rights log - Grant rights (He a very active user, and his edits are high quality.)

Verdict

I'm not giving a verdict here, however, rollback is a tool for reverting vandalism, not a 'reward' for high quality edits. User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:51, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

  • Has the user accepted the nomination? NovaHawk 01:55, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • Gave, talked over IRC {{SUBST:User:Kingcjc/sig}} 21:21, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

{{{content}}}


Lego Lord

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request unsuccessful

Lego lord has made many edits here which have helped benefit Brickipedia and I think he would make good use of the rollback rights in reverting vandalism despite the mistakes he has made. User:SKP4472/sig2 17:32, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Support

#Keep up the good work! User:SKP4472/sig2 17:32, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

  1. Sure Ajraddatz 21:31, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  2. O.K.Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 02:45, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Why shouldn't he be people keep bothering him when he is just trying to improve brickipedia. User:Agent Swipe/sig1 Agents-Logo.png - Down with vandalism 16:14, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  4. --Cligra "I predicted you'd look at me like i am insane and lo, it has now come to pass!" 15:41, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Please know that this is nothing personal. But the user does have a history of undoing legitimate edits which improve the article's quality and reverting them to how they want it. And, there there is apparently more than one user on the account, so the right would be given to multiple users, so I just can't trust that all users on the account are reliable, because I don't know who's editing (I don't mean who they are personally of course, but I can hardly tell if there's one person making great edits, and another not so great edits) NovaHawk 23:07, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I've been thinking about what's going on with him, and I'd say the same as NHL.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:10, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Disregards instruction , Bad quality, Bad Grammar, Multiple users, Insolent Gladiatoring 23:18, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ---It's a Kind of Madness--- Kingcjc 15:28, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

* Neutral: I've had to undo many, many edits because of bad grammar or a few other things. What countervandalism experience does he have?User:BobaFett2/sig2 17:33, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

I have encountered vandalism about twelve times and reverted it the hard way. Maybe not too many times, but why would it hurt if I have rollback rights? I have made errors a few times, but I try correcting them. User:Lego lord/sig.1 17:38, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Is there going to be any opposes? How long will it actually take for me to gain the rollback rights? User:Lego lord/sig.1 16:29, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Once it ends, you'll need enough supports.User:BobaFett2/sig2 18:40, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
How much? User:Lego lord/sig.1 21:17, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Vote should end on the 9th Jan if I remember correctly ---It's a Kind of Madness--- Kingcjc 21:20, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
    • Isn't it 2 weeks from the start date (ie, the 29th, making it the 12th)? And put me down for a neutral for now. @Lego lord- you need at least three support votes for it to pass, and the overall ratio must be 70% support. NovaHawk 22:25, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
I was wondering about that, thanks. User:Lego lord/sig.1 22:28, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
It was started on the 29th (Saturday). 12th is a Tuesday ---It's a Kind of Madness--- Kingcjc 16:23, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
Not according to my calendar- 12th of February I mean ;) (link) NovaHawk 23:07, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
Lol worked out the problem here. I used this site and looked at the month underneath instead :P ---It's a Kind of Madness--- Kingcjc 16:35, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral. First I think that you should gain you're Patroller rights back before this tool is awarded. Sorry.
User:SKP4472/sig2 08:01, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Agent Charge

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Successful

I do not want Vandalism on this wiki and try to delete all of it that I see and the Rollbacker rights would be helpful in doing that. Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 04:08, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. Sure Ajraddatz 23:33, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
  2. User:Agent Fuse/sig 22:13, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Got my vote! -Nerfblasterpro: Can you believe it's only been a year?Maverick.jpg 18:26, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
  4. The more rollback tools given to trustful users will make Brickipedia running more smoothly, sow why not? LEGO Lord 18:28, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Why not? User:SKP4472/sig2 20:35, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
  6. User:BobaFett2/sig2 17:26, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Tatooine

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Successful

In this summary, I will state in a brief manner why I am requesting rollback rights and how I plan to utilize it. In my experience here from June 6, 2010 on Brickipedia, I have learned a lot and encountered vandalism in a capacious amount of instances. In my history, I have reverted a great deal of the vandalism I encountered; but sometimes adding Speedydelete templates and "undo" links are not adequate (especially when an undo link is not available.) for the situation; and that is where Rollback rights shall step in. Especially if it means reverting an edit that in my case is not suitable for some audiences on this site or just regular counter-productive editing. I am up to these tasks, and with this right, vandalism shall cease a small bit more. If you guys feel I am in-adequate of handling this right; I shall work harder to make sure I one day obtain it for the greater good of Brickipedia. User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 02:03, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. Gladiatoring 02:41, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  2. NovaHawk 02:44, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Experienced on the wiki, history of countervandalism. Could obviously benefit from access to this tool. User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:09, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  4. User:BobaFett2/sig2 04:25, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ---- Kingcjc 09:01, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  6. I think you would benefit having this tool to help you revert vandalism more easliy as you do do a lot of counter vandalism work. Keep it up! User:SKP4472/sig2 12:17, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  7. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 16:37, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  8. Thomas Wonderson 00:50, January 10, 2011 (UTC)
  9. User:Agent Fuse/sig 03:25, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
  10. I think i can say congrats now :)--User:FreddyderHamster/sig 18:41, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • Thank you all for your votes, and great comments.:) With this right (as I said) will help me tremendously with the ongoing problem of vandalism. :) Thanks again! User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 18:46, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Berrybrick

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Failed

Change this text into a brief reason for requesting rollback rights. Berrybrick 20:55, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Not even filled in... ---- Kingcjc 20:58, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Some more experience in reverted vandalism would be good, and only just meets the minumum requirement (at 545 edits, with 136 of those blog/blog comment edits). Maybe try for patroller rights first? NovaHawk 21:09, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Not active in countervandalism, but definitely qualified for patroller rights. Please see Brickipedia:Requests for patroller. User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:54, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Like others have said, request for Patroller first and then have over 1,000 edits before re-requesting Rollback rights. User:SKP4472/sig2 12:13, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  5. You're doing well, but you didn't even fill in the top thing.User:BobaFett2/sig2 14:18, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Occasionally I undo some edits made by this person. Needs experience making constructive edits. --TheGrandEditor 17:23, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  7. PA User:Samdo994/sig1 18:51, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  8. Per Samdo,--User:FreddyderHamster/sig 18:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
  9. Per cjc. User:Captain Jag/sig1 18:12, January 14, 2011 (UTC)


Jurassicpark787

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Failed

I meet all requirements for it and if no one were to catch something but me, I could easily do it. Jurassic park787 Man Creates Dinosaur... 15:53, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Sorry, nothing personal or anything, but I just don't think this user needs it. They've made a total of 3 mainspace edits to the wiki in the last month, and doesn't have a history of reverting vandalism (or at least a recent one) NovaHawk 23:22, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Sorry but like what Nighthawk leader said, you rarely edit here on this Wiki and theirfore I don't see the need for you to have them. Please don't be offended. If you make more edits every month I might consider supporting your request. Once again I'm sorry. User:SKP4472/sig2 10:28, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

SKP4472

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Successful

I would like to request for Rollback because I have made more than enough edits and have been on Brickipedia for more than 30 days and have lots of experience and want to help prevent vandalism on this Wiki Thanks for your time. SKP4472 18:55, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. I've seen him do some good counter-vandalism. User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:07, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Count me in.User:Agent Fuse/sig 23:57, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Great editer. Count me in also! The dark knights2.png 21:18, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
  4. User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:47, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Very helpful with me!--LEGOCityManiac11 17:45, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Approve. --TheGrandEditor 20:04, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • Could some other people please vote on this? User:Ajraddatz/sig 16:21, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Agent Fuse

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Successful

I have been editing on Brickipedia for almost a year and it would come in handy while reverting vandalism. User:Agent Fuse/sig 00:50, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Got my vote --User:Agent Trace/sig1 00:56, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  2. I see some counter-vandalism work. User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:24, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  3. User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:44, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Gladiatoring 23:45, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  5. I'm in Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.png No Crime Stands on Brickipedia 19:30, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Hardworking user and a big help to this Wiki. Definately deserves this. SKP4472 06:55, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

TheGrandEditor

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination successful

User is often undo-ing vandalism and has shown themselves to be a good and trustworthy editor ----- Merry Christmas - Kingcjc 22:15, December 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. ----- Merry Christmas - Kingcjc 22:15, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
  2. No probs trusting this users edits Gladiatoring 22:25, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Per everything.User:BobaFett2/sig2 00:32, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
  4. A very trustworthy editor who will make good use of the rights. User:SKP4472/sig2 11:37, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Agreed to all above. User:Samdo994/sig1 12:47, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
  6. User:Agent Fuse/sig 21:53, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • Thank you guys! Thanks very much. --TheGrandEditor 22:42, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Request_for_Rollback/Archive&oldid=883826"