Brickipedia:Reviews/Featured Review Nominations/Archive

Successful nominations

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was done (October) NightblazeSaber's review on 9497 Republic Striker Starfighter (+5) Support per talk page idea ^ --User:CzechMate/czech 01:49, August 8, 2012 (UTC) I read his review, it is very good. Bob Bricks Sure. Very good. User:Cligra/Sig FR Quality. User:Darth henry/Sig 16:58, September 23, 2012 (UTC) I'll put this up on October 1st if I can remember. Berrybrick 22:58, September 23, 2012 (UTC) Oppose Comments @ Berrybrick: It's not over yet :P I didn't even know we had FR noms this month, I'll have to read over the noms when I have time, at a glance they all look great NovaHawk 23:21, September 23, 2012 (UTC) The nom was up in August though. :P Berrybrick 23:22, September 23, 2012 (UTC) Oh, right. I forgot we changed systems :) I'll rewrite that top bit now. NovaHawk 23:33, September 23, 2012 (UTC)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was done (November) Berrybrick's review on 6857 The Dynamic Duo Funhouse Escape (+5) Support ^ --User:CzechMate/czech 01:49, August 8, 2012 (UTC) Per Czech. —Nionel Definitely. Just so long as it doesn't get scheduled for a month next to 4644 Marina. User:Cligra/Sig Per Cligra. User:Darth henry/Sig 16:58, September 23, 2012 (UTC) NovaHawk 23:46, September 23, 2012 (UTC) Oppose Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was done (December) CzechMate's review on 9463 The Werewolf (+5) Great review, detailed and long. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig Support As nominator. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig Brilliant review. Clone gunner commander jedi talk Per Clone. User:Darth henry/Sig 16:58, September 23, 2012 (UTC) Wow User:Sonofhades101/signature 22:51, September 23, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101 Mentions fezzes and Matt Smith, how could this not be an FR? :P Oppose Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful ToaMeiko's review on 71006 The Simpsons House (+5) Support A very well made review with a lot of detailed pictures, and I think it's pretty fitting that the first review on the new Brickimedia and a review of a set which will be released to the general public the same day that we officially launch is featured NovaHawk 23:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC) Still disagree about the set, but per above. Berrybrick (talk) 23:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC) Per Nova. -LFY1547 14:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC) Per LFY CJC95 (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Very good review! I always like when people shows the bags, progress, and instrucions! User:Sibo2808/Sig Oppose Comments Commenting because it bothers me how empty sections sometimes break. :P Berrybrick (talk) 20:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)