Talk:Luis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Luis article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. The forum can be found here
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Brickipedia? Welcome!	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Dear rating members

C2fs need to be made C2s. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Can you please nominate it? --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Bureaucracy...blech Berrybrick (talk) 19:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

I allready nominated them, it's the rating people's duty now. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

You nominated it in October, before it was released, hence it receiving a c2f. As you haven't re-nominated it for c2, how are we to know? Also, I'd assume it is wrong to automatically assume that all c2fs are suddenly c2s. released => new information usually. CJC95 (talk) 20:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Exactly what I my thinking was ^ ToaMeiko (talk) 20:25, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Then why have C2fs in the first place, if we're going to have to re nominate it :/ Also it's up to you to keep track of which articles are what rating, not mine :| Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

C2f is for articles about topics that are unreleased (e.g. in the future), but that are as complete as they can be. C2f acknowledges that the article will need to be updated as soon as the subject is released as new information will come out and the article will no longer be up to date. The purpose of this is that instead of putting it in C4 or C3 until it's released and updated, it can be marked as complete for the time being so that users working on improving low class articles don't have to work on a C2f where no further information is available at the time. --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)